skip to Main Content
You Won’t Believe How Much The House Has Spent On Harassment Cases

You Won’t Believe How Much the House Has Spent on Harassment Cases

By Luke Rosiak

The number of disclosed financial settlements between the House of Representatives and employees who alleged that they were harassed or otherwise wronged at work rose to 41 cases at a cost of nearly $1 million, according to newly released information dating back to 1996 published by the Committee on House Administration.

The top Democrat and Republican on the panel jointly approved each of those settlements without being told the name of the accused member. Neither party’s representatives on the committee responded to a question about whether there were additional proposed settlements that they rejected or whether all of the proposed settlements were rubber-stamped.

Even at 41, the data is misleadingly incomplete. Many of the settlements that created the initial uproar around House harassment allegations are not captured in the count.

The settlements burst into the spotlight when Buzzfeed reported that Democratic Rep. John Conyers paid $27,000 out of his office budget to a woman who said she was fired for refusing his sexual advances. High-profile stories about Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva and Rep. Pat Meehan, a Pennsylvania Republican on the Committee on Ethics followed the initial reporting on Conyers.

However, those settlements are not included in the newly released House data, suggesting that the actual number is significantly higher and raising questions about how insightful the statistics are. The three mentioned settlements were paid with the members’ office funds and brokered by the Office of House Employment Counsel (OHEC). Meanwhile, the widely-cited data presents a different source of settlements — those managed by the Congressional Office of Compliance and paid out of a special fund at the Department of the Treasury.

OHEC was acting as members’ lawyer and “OHEC has attorney-client privilege with House employing offices, which is why the Committee wouldn’t have insight into their confidential discussions,” Erin McCracken, a spokeswoman for the Administration Committee, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an email.

McCracken did not respond to a question about whether such privilege would preclude the release of aggregate statistics without identifying information, or whether the committee had pressed it for such statistics, as OHEC would have the most comprehensive list.

OHEC did not respond to a request for comment by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

McCracken said the committee’s statistics focused on settlements which were brought to it by the Office of Compliance for approval under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (CAA). “The Committee was only alerted to settlements that involved the use of the Treasury account to settle a claim,” she said.

“Under House Rule 10, settlement amounts derived from a CAA claim involving a House office would have to receive joint approval from the Chair and Ranking Member of the Committee. Under this rule, anonymized facts of the House case would be provided to the Chair and Ranking Member. The record of approved amounts from House cases dating back to 1997 is what the OOC provided to the Committee and we released that information,” she continued.

That raises the question about what factors the members were weighing when approving the settlements, and whether there were any at all that they found improper. McCracken did not respond to a question about whether the committee’s hearing minutes showed the chair and ranking member ever voting not to approve a settlement. Neither did Eddie Flaherty, an an aide to Rep. Bob Brady of Pennsylvania, who has been the top Democrat on the panel since 2007.

Republican Rep. Gregg Harper of Mississippi chaired it this Congress, replacing a series of Republican chairmen who are no longer in office. The committee has proposed a bill than would ban members from paying future settlements from their office funds.

The most frequently-discussed settlement that is actually reflected in the released data because it went through the Office of Compliance is an $84,000 payment stemming from allegations against Rep. Blake Farenthold, after a staffer said he talked about “wet dreams” and “sexual fantasies.”

The data  show that the amount paid out by the Treasury fund has increased during each of the last three five-year periods:

 Time period Number Amount
1996-2002 14 $119,979
2003-2007 6 $70,022
2008-2012 15 $342,225
2013-2017 6 $359,450
 Total 41 $891,676
Follow Luke on Twitter. Send tips to luke@dailycallernewsfoundation.org. PGP key.
licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2018 Daily Caller News Foundation
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
This Post Has 43 Comments
  1. Thank you for every other magnificent article. The place else could anybody get that kind of information in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the look for such information.

  2. Just about all of the things you assert is astonishingly appropriate and that makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this in this light before. This article really did turn the light on for me as far as this issue goes. But at this time there is actually just one point I am not too comfy with and while I try to reconcile that with the central theme of your point, permit me see exactly what the rest of the subscribers have to point out.Very well done.

  3. Great ?V I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, web site theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Nice task..

  4. Good post and right to the point. I am not sure if this is truly the best place to ask but do you people have any thoughts on where to get some professional writers? Thx 🙂

  5. That is really fascinating, You are an excessively professional blogger. I have joined your feed and look ahead to in quest of more of your great post. Additionally, I have shared your site in my social networks!

  6. hey there and thank you in your info – I have definitely picked up something new from proper here. I did however experience several technical points the use of this site, as I experienced to reload the website lots of occasions prior to I may just get it to load properly. I were thinking about if your web hosting is OK? No longer that I’m complaining, but slow loading circumstances occasions will very frequently have an effect on your placement in google and could damage your high quality score if ads and ***********|advertising|advertising|advertising and *********** with Adwords. Well I am including this RSS to my email and can glance out for much more of your respective fascinating content. Ensure that you replace this once more very soon..

  7. A lot of of what you mention happens to be supprisingly accurate and it makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light before. Your article truly did turn the light on for me as far as this particular topic goes. Nonetheless at this time there is 1 issue I am not too cozy with so whilst I try to reconcile that with the core idea of the issue, allow me observe just what all the rest of the visitors have to say.Very well done.

  8. Thank you for another informative blog. Where else could I get that kind of information written in such an ideal way? I have a project that I’m just now working on, and I’ve been on the look out for such info.

  9. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web savvy so I’m not 100 sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

  10. Good day! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!

  11. Greetings! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one? Thanks a lot!

  12. Simply desire to say your article is as astounding. The clarity for your publish is just cool and i can think you’re knowledgeable on this subject. Fine together with your permission allow me to seize your RSS feed to stay up to date with drawing close post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please keep up the gratifying work.

  13. Viagra Online Free And Fast Shipping Viagra 40 Pills For 99 Generic 5mg Cialis Best Price [url=http://uscagsa.com]cialis[/url] Amoxicillin Physician Desk Reference Real Macrobid Fedex Shipping Valacyclovir 500 Mg

  14. After exploring a few of the articles on your web site, I truly appreciate your way of blogging.
    I saved it to my bookmark site list and will
    be checking back soon. Please check out my website as well and tell me what you think.

  15. I believe this is among the most significant information for
    me. And i am happy studying your article. But should
    observation on few common issues, The web site taste is perfect, the articles is really nice :
    D. Good process, cheers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *